United States v. Francis J. De Sisto
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
On a former appeal, 289 F.2d 833 (2 Cir. 1961), we reversed De Sisto’s conviction for hijacking a truck loaded with silk goods shipped from Japan, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, because of errors in the trial. After a new trial before Judge Mishler and a jury De Sisto was again convicted. His appeal raises questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence in the light of a change in the identification testimony of the truck driver on cross-examination, as to the evidentiary status of the driver’s prior identification, and as to charges and omissions to charge. We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- McNamara v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.