Legal Opinion

United States v. Francis J. De Sisto

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 15, 1964No. 296, Docket 28342PublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

On a former appeal, 289 F.2d 833 (2 Cir. 1961), we reversed De Sisto’s conviction for hijacking a truck loaded with silk goods shipped from Japan, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, because of errors in the trial. After a new trial before Judge Mishler and a jury De Sisto was again convicted. His appeal raises questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence in the light of a change in the identification testimony of the truck driver on cross-examination, as to the evidentiary status of the driver’s prior identification, and as to charges and omissions to charge. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. McNamara v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API