Legal Opinion

United States v. Hanhardt

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 26, 2001No. 00CR0853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of Defendant William Hanhardt to continue the September 4, 2001 trial date. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This case, which has previously been before the court on other issues, 1 arises out of an alleged organized crime conspiracy to commit jewelry thefts. Currently at issue is Hanhardt’s motion to continue the trial. Each of Hanhardt’s Co-Defendants has filed a similar motion to continue, where Co-Defendants join in Hanhardt’s motion, and raise individual arguments to continue. 2 This…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HanhardtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  2. United States v. HanhardtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  3. United States v. HanhardtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. Office of Public Advocacy v. Superior Court, First Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API