Legal Opinion

United States v. Hanhardt

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 13, 2006No. 00 CR 853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is a limited remand from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005), directing this court to indicate whether it would have sentenced the three Defendants differently, had the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) been advisory rather than mandatory at the time of sentencing. For the following reasons, the court determines that it would not have sentenced these Defendants differently had the Guidelines been advisory rather than mandatory.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Facts

Defendant…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Robert MykytiukCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Marlon McReynolds Jamie L. Thomas, and David Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Joseph N. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanhardt v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API