United States v. Hanhardt

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court are Defendants’ motions to suppress evidence obtained from intercepts authorized under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq (“Title III”). For the following reasons, the motions are denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This marks the sixth time the court has written an opinion in this case. 1 The case arises from an alleged organized crime conspiracy to commit jewelry thefts across the nation. As part of the Government’s investigation, on January 2, 1996, it submitted a Title III application to Chief Judge…