Legal Opinion
United States v. Hanhardt
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 20, 2001No. 1:00-cr-00853PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of Defendant Joseph Basinski to continue the September 4, 2001 trial date, set by order of May 18, 2001. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises out of an alleged organized crime conspiracy to commit jewelry thefts. Currently at issue is Basinski’s motion to continue the trial. Defendant William Hanhardt filed a motion to continue the trial, to which Basinski and each of the Co-Defendants joined, and raised individual arguments to continue. 1 On July 26, 2001, the court issued an…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. De Castro-FontDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- United States v. HanhardtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Andrew Corp. v. Beverly Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. HanhardtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. WiestCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.