Legal Opinion

State v. Toben

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2014No. 26570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Jason D. Toben was convicted, of possessing and distributing synthetic marijuana. He had been selling these products when they were legal, but they became illegal after emergency legislation took effect. His defense at trial was that he mistakenly believed that the products had no illicit substances in them based on the package labeling and the representations from the commercial distributors. In closing arguments, the prosecutor contended that ignorance of the law was no excuse, comparing the charges to a speeding violation. Yet the crucial question for the jury was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. United States of America, Ex Rel. Ted Means v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Sioux Falls, South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Rady I. Sdoulam, Also Known as Rady I. Sduolam, Also Known as Roddy Ibrahim, Also Known as Rady A. SdoulamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. PfeifferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. FidelerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State v. FidelerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API