Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2017No. 28025PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZinter, Justice

[¶1.3 Christopher Martin appeals from his conviction of unlawfully possessing a controlled substance. He contends the State’s evidence- was insufficient to prove he knowingly possessed oxycodone. We affirm. ... . . .

[¶2.] On September 15, 2015, Rapid City Police Officer Eric Holmquist located an abandoned vehicle that Martin had reported stolen. While waiting for Martin to arrive, Holmquist determined Martin had an outstanding arrest warrant. When Martin arrived, he was arrested on the warrant and searched incident to arrest. Holmquist found twenty-three oxycodone pills in Martin?s pocket,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward CarranzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. McFadden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. United States v. David Carrera and Luis M. CarreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. State v. KietzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. StoneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. StoneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. QuistSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. PodzimekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. PodzimekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API