Legal Opinion
Loew v. Falsey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 13, 1956PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff brought an action in the nature of mandamus to the Superior Court to compel the issuance of a building permit. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed.
The finding is not subject to correction. The salient facts are these: The named defendant is the building inspector of the defendant city of New Haven. The plaintiff operates a number of open-air drive-in theaters through two corporations of which he owns the stock and exercises control—E. M. Loew, Inc., which will be referred to herein as the Loew corporation, and E. M. Loew Theaters, Inc.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Rourke v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Silverco, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Lee Bros. Furniture Co. v. CramSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Mad River Co. v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- In re Juvenile Appeal (85-BC)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Burke v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.