Legal Opinion

Burkert v. Bennett

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion to strike out parts of the answer.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

It would be difficult to draw a more illiterate

and unscientific answer; but the plaintiff has mistaken the remedy against most of it. The four so-called “ defences ” cannot be struck out for insufficiency. The remedy is demurrer. The introduction to each one, however, in these words, viz., “ and repeating the allegations and denials hereinbefore set forth as completely as if herein fully set forth ”, must be struck out as irrelevant and redundant. A “ defence ” must be complete in and of itself, and can consist only of “ new matter ” which constitutes a defence to the action, i. e., new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Durst v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Staten Island Midland Railroad v. HinchcliffeNew York Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blaut v. BlautNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Pascekwitz v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Leonorovitz v. OttNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Dunlap v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Galbraith v. DailyNew York Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API