Burkert v. Bennett
New York Supreme Court
Motion to strike out parts of the answer.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
It would be difficult to draw a more illiterate
and unscientific answer; but the plaintiff has mistaken the remedy against most of it. The four so-called “ defences ” cannot be struck out for insufficiency. The remedy is demurrer. The introduction to each one, however, in these words, viz., “ and repeating the allegations and denials hereinbefore set forth as completely as if herein fully set forth ”, must be struck out as irrelevant and redundant. A “ defence ” must be complete in and of itself, and can consist only of “ new matter ” which constitutes a defence to the action, i. e., new…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Durst v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Staten Island Midland Railroad v. HinchcliffeNew York Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blaut v. BlautNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Pascekwitz v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1902
- Leonorovitz v. OttNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Dunlap v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1902
- Galbraith v. DailyNew York Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.