Pascekwitz v. Richards
New York Supreme Court
Actios" against the directors of theQ Staten Island Cricket and Baseball Club, a membership corporation organized "under chapter 267 of the laws of 1875 (superseded by chapter 559, laws of 1895), to recover for supplies, viz., cigars, alleged to have been sold to the club while the defendants were such directors.
1Opinion of the Court
Gtathor, J.:
The action is against the directors of a membership corporation, as authorized by section 11 of chapter 559 of the laws of 1895, to recover for supplies sold to the corporation between May 6th and Hovember 27th, i'900.
There was no dispute on the trial as to any of the facts, except *251that it was claimed that some of the defendants were not directora during all of the period of time covered by the sales, but only during certain parts thereof, respectively; from which it is urged that there is a misjoinder of several different causes of action, inasmuch as each director is liable only…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Staten Island Midland Railroad v. HinchcliffeNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Burkert v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Kelly v. SammisNew York Supreme Court · 1898
- Laurie v. DuerNew York Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dixon v. PruettNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Mitterwallner v. Supreme Lodge, Knights & Ladies of the Golden StarCity of New York Municipal Court · 1902
- Mitterwallner v. Supreme Lodge, Knights & Ladies of the Golden StarCity of New York Municipal Court · 1902