Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Stewart

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1902Published

Action by Charles R. Dunlap against David J. Stewart and others. Demurrer to answer overruled.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

The plaintiff demurs as follows: “To each of the several defences contained in the amended answer and numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4 on the ground that the same are and each of them is insufficient in law on the face thereof,” i. e., in the words of section 494 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which allows demurrers to counterclaims and defences.

But on reference to the answer the so-called “defences” which are demurred to are found not to be defences at all, but only denials. In the nomenclature of pleading a “denial” is not a “defence.” Code Civ. Proc. § 500 et seq.; Burlcert v. Bennett, 35 Misc.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burkert v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API