Legal Opinion

Blaut v. Blaut

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion to strike out from each of four separate defenses and a counterclaim the initial words that the defendant “ reiterates all the admissions and denials contained in paragraphs I to IX of this answer.”

1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.

La the first nine paragraphs of the answer the defendant specifically admits or denies the several allegations of the complaint; then follow four separate defenses and a counterclaim. Each of these defenses and the counterclaim begins with a recital, that the defendant “ reiterates all the admissions and denials contained in paragraphs I to IX of this answer inclusive and ” alleges •* * * . Motion is made to strike out the words in quotation. It is well settled# as contended by the defendant, that an affirmative defense or a counterclaim must be treated as a separate plea, and that, upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cragin v. . LovellNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Douglass v. . FerrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Uggla v. BrokawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. South Dakota v. McChesneyNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Flechter v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burnham v. FranklinNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Rogers v. MortonNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bulova v. E. L. Barnett, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920
  4. Clarkin v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Goldberg v. WoodAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API