Legal Opinion

Penrod v. HOSKINSON, MD

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1976No. 13251PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Haswell

This is an original proceeding for declaratory judgment pursuant to Rule 1 of the Rules of the Montana Supreme Court. It is based upon the certification of the Hon. James F. Battin, United States District Judge, presiding in a civil cause in United States District .Court for the District of Montana entitled “Jeanette Penrod, plaintiff, v. William S. Hoskinson, M.D., defendant.”

The certification states that such litigation involves a controlling question of Montana law as to which there is a substantial ground for a difference of opinion, viz. whether section 93-2624, R.C.M.1947, as amended,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. St. Patrick's HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Dunham v. Southside National Bank of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Steele v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Guiterman v. WishonMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Sullivan v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Yamaguchi v. Queen's Medical CenterHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Olson v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re the Marriage of WatersMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Williams v. Wellman-Power Gas, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API