Legal Opinion
Harry M. Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 29, 1983No. 82-2460PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
The appellant, Harry M. Williams, brought suit in federal district court against both his former employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), and his union, Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO, charging each with discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, § 701 et seq., Pub.L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat. 253 (1964) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1976)). The district judge found that Williams had failed to comply with the filing requirements set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 2000C-5. 1 She therefore granted…
3Cases cited33 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by69 opinions
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Michael Weston v. Commonwealth of of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Perkins v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Sharon Puckett, Cross-Appellee v. Tennessee Eastman Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Leonard Jarrell v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.