Legal Opinion

Rischard v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1920No. L. A. No. 5319PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Ticknor & Carter, L. L. Riccardi, and J. W. Morin for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

—The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and the defendant made a contract whereby the defendant undertook to construct a dwelling-house on a lot belonging to the plaintiff, in accordance with certain plans and specifications, for the sum of two thousand six hundred dollars; that the defendant had completed the building but had failed to construct it according to the plans and specifications, whereby the plaintiff was damaged in the sum of $1,378.

The answer denies the allegations of the complaint concerning the failure to construct the building as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API