Legal Opinion

Long v. Ansell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 5, 1934No. 18PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beandeis

On March 27, 1933, Samuel T. Ansell, a resident of the District of Columbia, brought, in the Supreme Court of the District, an action for libel against Huey P. Long of Louisiana. The summons was served on the defendant within the District. It directed him to answer and show cause why the plaintiff should not have judgment for the cause of action stated in his declaration. The defendant, appearing specially, and solely for the purpose, filed on April 25, 1933, a motion to quash the summons and the service thereof on the following ground:

“ The summons was issued on Monday, March 27,1933, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. GEYER'S v. IrwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1790
  4. Rhodes v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Phillips v. BrowneIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Torres v. MadridSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. William C. Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API