Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Central Savings & Loan Ass'n

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 1, 1990No. 05-90-00030-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

John H. Cockrell has appealed the trial court’s summary judgment entered on November 20, 1989 (the November summary judgment). Central Savings and Loan Association argues that the trial court entered a final summary judgment on July 12, 1989 (the July summary judgment); therefore, Cockrell’s appeal is untimely. After reviewing the parties’ jurisdictional briefs, this Court holds that the July summary judgment was final, that Cockrell’s subsequent amended counterclaim constituted a second, independent suit, albeit filed under the same cause number as the first suit, and that the…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. City of Beaumont v. GuilloryTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Philbrook v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. LindsayTexas Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jobe v. Lapidus, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  2. Williams v. National Mortgage Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  3. MacArangal v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Florance v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Buckland, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API