Legal Opinion
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 20, 1964No. Civ. A. 5393PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, District Judge.
This suit is brought to set aside and annul an order issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission on July 1, 1963. The statutory basis of the action includes the provisions of Sections 1336, 1398, 2284, and 2321-2325 of the Judicial Code (28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325), Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 1009), and Section 17(9) of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. § 17(9)). A temporary restraining order was granted on August 21, 1963, and has remained in effect since that time. Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Central Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1967
- Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.