Legal Opinion
Central Power & Light Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1980No. Nos. 80-1068, 80-1172PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, Circuit Judge:
These two consolidated petitions for review of an order by the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC” or “Commission”) involve a single set of facts and require that this circuit for the first time address a provision added to the Interstate Commerce Act by the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (“Reform Act”),1 and regulations promulgated by the Commission interpreting a second provision added by the Reform Act. The new statutory provision requiring interpretation, Section 206 of the Reform Act, now revised and codified at 49…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- National Insulation Transportation Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Mississippi Valley Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Iowa Power and Light Company, a Corporation v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Corporation, Iowa Power and Light Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, and Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent (Two Cases). Iowa Power and Light Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Iowa Power and Light Company, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.