Legal Opinion

Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 26, 1979No. Nos. 77-2070, 77-2071PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge LEVENTHAL.

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated petitions for review bring before the court for the first time a new provision added to the Interstate Commerce Act by the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (the “Reform Act”).1 That provision, now revised and codified as 49 U.S.C. § 10729, provides for expedited consideration by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC or Commission) of any proposed rate filing by a rail carrier that is for new service requiring a total capital investment of $1,000,000 or more. If the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. National Insulation Transportation Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  2. Coal Exporters Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. San Antonio, Texas Acting by and Through Its City Public Service Board v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenors. State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenors. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, City of San Antonio, Texas, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API