Process Components, Inc. v. Baltimore Aircoil Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Liberally construing defendant’s brief, it seems defendant contends the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict because plaintiff had not proved damages. In order to recover damages for lost profits, an injured plaintiff must prove its losses with reasonable certainty. Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc., 319 N.C. 534, 356 S.E. 2d 578 (1987). Where the action is in tort, as in this case, damages must be the natural and probable result of the tortfeasor’s misconduct. Id. The measure of damages under G.S. 75-1.1 should also reflect the fact…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Combs & Associates, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Edwards v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Smith Setzer & Sons, Inc. v. South Carolina Procurement Review PanelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.