Legal Opinion
Smith Setzer & Sons, Inc. v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1994No. 93-1111PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge PHILLIPS and Judge SMITH joined.
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
This case challenges the constitutionality of South Carolina’s legislatively-enacted program under which certain South Carolina products and South Carolina vendors are given slight preferences in the bidding process for certain types of state procurement. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court and sustain the statutes.
I
A
The South Carolina Code and implementing regulations establish two separate preference schemes,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Audio Odyssey, Ltd. v. Brenton First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Farley v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Gullett v. Van Dyke Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
- Eastern Minerals International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Foto USA, Inc. v. Board of Regents of the University System of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.