Legal Opinion

Wisotsky v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 12, 2006No. 04-300CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

This case originates with the plaintiffs involuntary discharge from the military. Plaintiff Daniel P. Wisotsky enlisted in the United States Marine Corps Reserve on November 27, 1979, and joined the Regular Marine Corps on December 23, 1981. Mr. Wisotsky was involuntarily separated from the service on March 31, 1998, after approximately sixteen and one-half years of active duty. He attempted to re-enlist, but his bid to do so was denied because of the nature of his discharge from the military: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC).

Prior to the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Christopher W. Caldbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Stein v. DowlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  4. Enriquez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. Golden It, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API