Legal Opinion
Otis Elevator Co. v. Geiger
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky
Decided March 30, 1901No. 6,819PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Bill for Infringement of Patents. On exceptions to answer. Exceptions sustained.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The complainant, a corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey, in its bill charges that it is the owner, by mesne conveyances duly recorded, of certain letters patent, *132■which the -defendants have infringed and will continue to infringe; and the usual prayer for an injunction and accounting of profits is contained in the bill. The defendant has filed an answer, the third paragraph of which is in this language:
“These defendants have no knowledge of the assignments alleged to have been made of the said letters patent, and therefore deny the same, and deny that any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Sawyer-Man Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
- National Harrow Co. v. HenchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1897
- Strait v. National Harrow Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1892
- National Harrow Co. v. HenchU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1896
- National Harrow Co. v. QuickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radio Corporation of America v. Majestic DistributorsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1931
- United States Fire Escape Counterbalance Co. v. Joseph Halsted Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1912
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. UllmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
- Cilley v. United Shoe Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1907
- Fraser v. DuffeyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.