Legal Opinion
Cilley v. United Shoe Mach. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided February 13, 1907No. 27PublishedCited by 5 opinions
At Law. On demurrer to declaration.
1Opinion of the Court
COLT, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit brought under the provisions of Act Cong. July 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 209, c. 647 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3202], in which the defendant is charged with making contracts in restraint of trade or commerce among the several states or with foreign nations, and with an attempt to monopolize such trade or commerce, whereby the plaintiff has been injured in his business and property. Section 7 of the act provides as follows:
“Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by .reason of anything forbidden or declared to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- In re GreeneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1892
- United States v. PattersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1893
- United States v. GreenhutDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1892
- Rice v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
- Ware-Kramer Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1910
- Hurt v. BrandtIdaho Supreme Court · 1923