National Harrow Co. v. Hench
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, the national Harrow Company, seeks an injunction restraining the defendants, Hench & Dromgold, from selling float spring-tooth harrows, harrow frames, and attachments applicable thereto, upon more favorable terms as to price to purchasers thereof than the prices stipulated in two license contracts annexed to the bill, and a decree for the specific enforcement of said contracts, and for an accounting at the rate of five dollars for each harrow, etc., sold in violation of the terms of said license contracts.
Several defenses are insisted on, but in the view…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nester v. Continental Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Pittsburg Carbon Co. v. McMillinNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- National Harrow Co. v. QuickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895
- Merz Capsule Co. v. United States Capsule Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Beit v. BeitSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- National Harrow Co. v. HenchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1897
- Blount Mfg. Co. v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. International Business Machine Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.