United States Fire Escape Counterbalance Co. v. Joseph Halsted Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
In Equity. Suit by the United States Fire Escape Counterbalance Company against the Joseph Halsted Company.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
Exceptions to amendment to answer. An order sustaining exceptions to a part of the original answer having been made, defendant was allowed to amend, and did so, March *296IS, 1912. Exceptions being made to the amendment and heard, defendant offered a substitute amendment, and made a motion for ieave "to file April 10, 1912. This motion was granted, the exceptions to the amendment to stand as exceptions to the substitute. The only-question is whether the assignment of a patent in aid of a combination made unlawful by the Sherman Act operates to pass title, or is to be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harms v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1922
- Radio Corporation of America v. Majestic DistributorsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1931
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Eclair Film Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1913
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. Bi-Metallic Inv. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.