Legal Opinion

Century 21-Mabel O. Pettus, Inc. v. City of Jennings

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 21, 1985No. 66786PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

The appellant, City of Jennings, by its zoning ordinance,1 prohibited the posting of “advertising signs” in residential districts. Employees of appellant, without permission of respondent, removed a “For Sale” sign which respondent, a licensed real estate broker, had placed on certain residential property at the direction of the owners. Suit was brought to prevent appellant from removing “For Sale” or “For Lease” signs and following hearing the court permanently enjoined their removal. Because the validity of a statute is in issue, the cause falls *810within the exclusive appellate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Marshall v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. State Ex Inf. Atty. Gen. v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. J.A.D. v. F.J.D.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Callier v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. City of Dellwood v. TwyfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Brunner v. City of ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Abbott Ambulance v. St. Charles County Ambulance DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API