Legal Opinion

Cantwell v. Allegheny County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1984No. 13 W.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

The issue in this negligence case concerns the scope of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 324A (1965). More specifically, we must decide whether county crime labs, which undertake to perform scientific tests at the request of the police, should recognize that the results of those tests are necessary for the protection of criminal suspects who may be affected by them, such that the labs’ failure to use due care in performing those tests will render the labs liable in tort to injured criminal suspects.

The complaint in this case sets forth the following relevant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. EMBRYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Pascarella v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Karns v. Tony Vitale Fireworks Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Kane v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Poyser v. Newman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. DiMarco v. Lynch Homes-Chester County, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Walters v. UPMC Presbyterian ShadysideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API