Legal Opinion

In Re Segall

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1987No. 63456PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a three-count complaint charging respondent, Morton Allan Segall, with professional misconduct. Count I of the complaint charged that respondent’s attempts to settle a lawsuit brought against him by the Carte Blanche Corporation violated Rules 1— 102(a)(4), 1 — 102(a)(5) and 7-104(a)(l) of the Code of Professional Responsibility (87 Ill. 2d Rules 1 — 102(a)(4), 1 — 102(a)(5), 7 — 104(a)(1)). Count II charged the same violations with regard to respondent’s attempts to settle a lawsuit brought against him by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GilmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Amoco Oil Co. v. SegallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. In Re ArmentroutIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Novoselsky v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. In Re Discipline of SchaeferNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re GerardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API