Legal Opinion
In Re Discipline of Schaefer
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2001No. 36173PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Two formal disciplinary complaints representing four grievances against attorney John Michael Schaefer were brought by the state bar and were consolidated for hearing before a panel of the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board. The panel found that Schaefer had violated several professional conduct rules, including Supreme Court Rule 182, which prohibits a lawyer from directly contacting a represented party without the consent of that party’s counsel, unless the contact is otherwise authorized by law. Some of the SCR 182 violations found by the panel occurred during the course of…
3Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by56 opinions
- In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Medina County Bar Ass'n v. CameronOhio Supreme Court · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.