Legal Opinion
In re C.G.
Grand Ronde Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Associate Justice.
Mother and her uncle appeal from a permanent plan order in this juvenile dependency case. The trial court assumed jurisdiction over the child under Tribal Code Section 7.11(a) on June 27, 2002. The Court held a permanency plan review hearing under Tribal Code Section 7.14(c)(10) on October 22 and December 11, 2003, at which it changed the permanent plan from “Return of Custody” to “Adoption.” See Tribal Code § 7.14(c)(4). The permanent plan order is a final order for the purposes of appeal. Tribal Code S 7.14(d). We exercise jurisdiction under Tribal Code…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Synowski v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ralph A. Renfro Josephine Renfro v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Suitor v. SuitorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde CommunityGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2004