Legal Opinion
Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community
Grand Ronde Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2004No. A-03-02-002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. MILLER, Chief Justice.
Ed Pearsall (“Petitioner”) appeals the decision of the trial court that affirmed the Tribal Council’s decision to temporarily suspend him from his position as a Council member for violations of the now-repealed tribal ethics ordinance. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Tribal Code § 310(h)(2) and AFFIRM.
I. Facts
Petitioner was an elected member of the Grand Ronde Tribal Council in 2001 when Jan Michael Reibach (“Reibach Jr.”) brought an ethics complaint against him under the Grand Ronde Tribal Ethical Standards Ordinance (TESO), farmer Tribal Code §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alexander v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2016
- Fite v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re C.G.Grand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re C.G.Grand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2005
- McGee v. Spirit Mountain Gaming, Inc.Grand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004