Legal Opinion
Synowski v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde
Grand Ronde Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 2003No. A-01-10-001PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Associate Justice.
Respondent-Appellant Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde appeals from the trial court’s order reversing the decision of the Independent Review Board (IRB),1 which upheld the termination of Petitioner-Appellee Richard Synowski’s employment with the Tribe. The trial court concluded that Synowski’s right to due process was violated at his IRB hearing because he had received inadequate notice and been denied the right to assistance of counsel at his own expense. We exercise jurisdiction under Tribal Code § 310(h)(2) and affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In April 1997, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde CommunityGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde CommunityGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2004
- Robertson v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2004
- Alexander v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2015
- Alexander v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.