Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Barbara Bauman and 22 other Argentinian residents filed a lawsuit under the Alien Tort Claims Act against Daimler-Chrysler AG for human rights violations allegedly committed by Mercedes Benz Argentina, its subsidiary, in Argentina during the 1970s military regime. DaimlerChrysler AG filed a successful Rule 12(b)(2) motion, the lawsuit was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, and this appeal ensued. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellants are 23 Argentinian citizens and residents1 who allege, inter alia, that they (or their family…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Patterson v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- WMCV PHASE 3, LLC v. Shushok & McCoy, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2010
- Waterfall Homeowners Ass'n v. Viega, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Biomeasure, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.