Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 16, 2010No. CV-09-992-PHX-GMSPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dan Patterson (“Plaintiff’) brings the instant negligence and products liability action against Defendants Home Depot USA, Inc. (“Home Depot”), Krause-Werk GmbH & Co. KG (“Krause-Werk”), and Krause, Inc. (Dkt. # 1.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), Krause-Werk now moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Dkt. # 12.) Both Plaintiff and Home Depot filed responsive memoranda opposing Krause-Werk’s Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. # #17, 20.) Because, based on the facts as presented to date, exercising specific…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arizona School Risk Retention Trust, Inc. v. NMTC, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- In Re Hydroxycut Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
- MMI, INC. v. Baja, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Zero Motorcycles, Inc. v. Pirelli Tyre S.p.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Alassaf v. AlkordyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.