Legal Opinion

Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Synthes (U.S.A.)

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided September 28, 2006No. 02-2873 Ma/APublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S PRAYER FOR ENTRY OF A PERMANENT INJUNCTION

MAYS, District Judge.

On November 13, 2002, Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc. (“Smith & Nephew”) sued Defendants Synthes (U.S.A.) and Synthes-Stratec, Inc. (collectively, “Synthes”) for infringement of two patents, U.S. Patent No. 5,167,663 (“the '663 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 5,312,406 (“the '406 patent”). The patents relate to intramedullary nails and the methods used in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures using interfragmentary compression. On May 14, 2004, the court held a patent construction hearing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States v. Loew's Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  3. MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  4. Funai Elec. Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  5. Enpat, Inc. v. BudnicDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API