Havird v. Richmond County
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The first instance, so far as we are aware, where this court defined the meaning of the term “bridge” was in Daniels v. Intendant &c. of Athens, 55 Ga. 609. It was there held that a contiguous embankment necessary to make access to a bridge, so as to pass teams and wagons over it, is a part of the bridge, and title to the bridge covers such an embankment. But if the embankment is not a necessary part of the bridge, but a part of the streets of the municipality, the town, and not the county, would be bound to keep it in repair. As to liability for injuries caused by bridges, this court held,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Howington v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Daniels v. Intendant & WardensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- County of Tattnall v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Hackney v. Coweta CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grady County v. BankerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Havird v. Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Pike County v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Berrien County v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Bibb County v. WorthenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.