Legal Opinion

County of Tattnall v. Newton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1901PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Evans. Tattnall superior court. April 30,1900.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

A mule was injured by reason of a decayed plank in a bridge spanning a stream in Tattnall county and constituting a portion of a public road of the county which crossed this stream. Newton, the owner of the mule, brought an action against the county and had a recovery. The case comes to this court upon three questions, two of law and one of fact.

1. The first legal question may be thus stated: Where an ordinary in charge of the county roads agrees with the citizens of a given community, who desire the erection of a bridge over a stream at a *780place crossed by a public road, that if they will…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Penick v. County of MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Howington v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Lincoln County v. GazzawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Wright v. Floyd CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Meriwether County v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API