Havird v. Richmond County
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. A fill or an embankment in a road wliieli constitutes the approach to a bridge and which is necessary to make access to the bridge is a part of the bridge. Daniels v. Athens, 55 Ga. 609; City Council of Augusta v. Hudson, 94 Ga. 135 (21 S. E. 289); Howington v. Madison County, 126 Ga. 699 (55 S. E. 941); Morgan County v. Glass, 139 Ga. 415 (77 S. E. 583).
2. Where a new bridge was erected across a river, and a fill or an embankment in the roadway which led to the old bridge was, after having been damaged by flood waters, rebuilt and adjusted to the new bridge, and this structure constituted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City Council of Augusta v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Howington v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Daniels v. Intendant & WardensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Warren County v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Morgan County v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berrien County v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- DeKalb County v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- James v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Johnson County v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Stone v. McMeekin Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.