Legal Opinion
Raimonde v. Purcell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1953No. 1318PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
The parties are here for the second time in a suit claiming damages against a broker for alleged misrepresentations in connection with the purchase of a rooming house business from a man named Irvin.
In March, 1949 Raimonde, appellant here, filed his first suit naming as defendants the vendor Irvin and the brokers Purcell and Keach. (Irvin was not served with process and the case proceeded against the brokers alone.) In his complaint Raimonde alleged that the brokers had induced him to enter into the contract on the representation that a lease on the premises would be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spilker v. HankinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Slater v. CannonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Mitchell v. DavidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Hankin v. SpilkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Easter v. Kass-Berger, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Anguiano v. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- De Foe v. National Capital BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Bacon v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956