Legal Opinion
De Foe v. National Capital Bank
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 11, 1953No. 1347PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Almost two years ago appellant filed a motion in Municipal Court to vacate a purported consent judgment which had been entered December 12, 1949. The motion was denied and she then filed a motion for rehearing thereof. The motion for rehearing was also denied. Then followed a motion to reconsider the denial of a rehearing of the motion to vacate. This last motion was also denied and thereupon the case was brought to this court for review. (In that appeal and in the proceedings in the trial court Eva P. DeFoe was joined by her daughter, Geraldine DeFoe. This appeal, though first noted in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Randolph v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Cory v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- De Foe v. National Capital Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re LEMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- De Foe v. National Capital BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954