Colgate v. Juul Labs, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
William H. Orrick, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs are adults and minors from seven states bring class claims against defendant JUUL Labs, Inc. ("JUUL"), a market leader in the burgeoning electronic cigarette industry, for various state law violations related to JUUL's advertising and labelling of its electronic cigarettes. JUUL argues that the Tobacco Control Act, 21 U.S.C. § 387 et seq. ("TCA") preempts plaintiffs' claims. It is partially correct concerning its product labelling, because the TCA is very detailed about what must appear on the label. But claims that JUUL misrepresents…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Argueta v. Walgreens CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Chang v. CashmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Costa v. Reliance Vitamin Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Crawford v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Daniel Litman; and Paige Lopynski, collectively p/k/a “Bonnie X Clyde” v. Lowly Palace, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Create Music Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation; CBMG, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and Does 1-District Court, C.D. California · 2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.