Legal Opinion

Costa v. Reliance Vitamin Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 18, 2023No. 3:22-cv-04679Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAYLOR COSTA, Case No. 3:22-cv-04679-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 RELIANCE VITAMIN CO., INC., Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Taylor Costa filed an amended complaint in this putative class action on behalf of 14 herself and a class of California consumers, alleging that defendant Reliance Vitamin LLC 15 misleadingly packages and sells its protein powder in containers that are unnecessarily large and 16 contain unlawful “slack fill.” Reliance moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API