Chang v. Cashman

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STACY CHANG, Case No. 22-cv-02010-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY 9 v. JUDGMENT AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 10 CARLOS CASHMAN, et al., JUDGMENT 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 132 12 13 In this employment action arising out of an alleged failed joint investment venture, 14 Plaintiff Stacy Chang sues Defendants Carlos Cashman, Arrowside Capital, LLC, Arrowside Fund 15 GP, LLC, Arrowside Ventures, LLC, Cashman Family Investments II LLC, and Perseverus LLC1 16 (collectively, “Defendants”) for (1)…