Legal Opinion
Tarnoski v. Kanarr Corp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 1974No. Appeal, No. 811 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
This is an appeal by a claimant from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County which sus*490tamed a dismissal of his claim petition by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) as not filed within tbe time specified by Section 315 of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §602.
On February 19, 1966, Peter Tarnoski (Appellant) sustained an injury to his right eye while in the regular course of his employment as a millwright in the Walben division of the Nanarr Corporation( Appellee). This…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Palmer v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Meyers v. Lehigh Valley Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Mucha v. Bayard & Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Angermier v. Hubley Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dudley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. GriffithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Taglianetti v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Helstrom v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.