Helstrom v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
Frank Helstrom (Petitioner) brings this appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing a referee’s decision which had granted workmen’s compensation benefits to Petitioner. The only issue presented for our consideration is whether Petitioner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations found in Section 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §602 (Act). We hold that the claim was barred and, accordingly, we affirm.
There is no dispute as to the facts of this case.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ratto v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Thorn v. STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Lewis v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Segal v. SEGALSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hickey v. Cudahy Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mangine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Taglianetti v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Roberts v. Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Auerbach v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bergmeister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.