Legal Opinion

Mucha v. Bayard & Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1954No. Appeal, 89PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This is an appeal by the employer from a workmen’s compensation award granted claimant by the court below. The referee found in favor of the claimant, the Board reversed the referee, and the court below reversed the Board.

Claimant, a machinist, was injured on October 14, 1941, when struck in the eye by a piece of metal. Two doctors determined that the accident caused a cataract in his eye. About a year later one of the doctors advised him to have an operation; the other felt he could wait longer for the cataract to develop. Claimant decided to postpone the operation and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Lewis v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Meyers v. Lehigh Valley Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Thorn v. STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Palmer v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API