Mucha v. Bayard & Co., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
This is an appeal by the employer from a workmen’s compensation award granted claimant by the court below. The referee found in favor of the claimant, the Board reversed the referee, and the court below reversed the Board.
Claimant, a machinist, was injured on October 14, 1941, when struck in the eye by a piece of metal. Two doctors determined that the accident caused a cataract in his eye. About a year later one of the doctors advised him to have an operation; the other felt he could wait longer for the cataract to develop. Claimant decided to postpone the operation and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Lewis v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Meyers v. Lehigh Valley Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by14 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Thorn v. STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Palmer v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.