Legal Opinion

State v. Dyer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1989No. C8-88-1544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Appellant Christopher Alan Dyer appeals his conviction for the unlawful possession and sale of various controlled substances, claiming that: (1) the search warrant was invalid; (2) his statements to the police should be suppressed as the result of an illegal search and seizure; and (3) it was error to give him a felony point for a 1979 theft conviction. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 12, 1987, a Richfield police officer, acting as an undercover agent, accompanied Gregory Scott Rasmussen to an apartment complex in South Minneapolis. Rasmussen went into the building with $84.00…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Michael E. Jones, United States of America v. Ralph Milton PfeisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Christopher GitchoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Julius Randolph JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. State v. WassonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API