Legal Opinion
Garza v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 5, 2000No. C8-00-526, CX-00-527PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge *
Appellants Xavier Garza, Jr., and Xavier Garza, Sr., challenge their convictions for fourth-degree controlled substance crime, arguing that the no-knock authorization for execution of a search warrant for their house was not supported by any particular facts. We reverse.
FACTS
In February 1998, police setup surveillance of the Garza residence for suspected marijuana trafficking. On February 24, 1998, the police applied for a search warrant. The warrant application contained an affidavit of a police detective. According to the detective’s affidavit, Garza Jr. had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. James Ray MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James Ray MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James Ray MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002